P Everpure
Intrinsic value$12.29
Price (at call)$113.66
Margin of safety
-89.2%
vs market (rating basis)
-60.5%
Model unavailable; showing baseline valuation.
⚠ LLM error: empty response; using baseline
The story
Value drivers
| Revenue growth (Y1) | 10.0% |
| Terminal growth | 3.5% |
| Forecast horizon | 10y |
| Target operating margin | 6.6% |
| Years to target margin | 5 |
| Sales-to-capital | 2.95 |
| Beta | 1.43 |
| Failure probability | 0.0% |
| Cost of capital (WACC) | 11.4% |
| Terminal WACC | 9.5% |
Valuation bridge
| PV of explicit FCFF | 1.19B |
| PV of terminal value | 2.05B |
| Equity value | 4.09B |
| ÷ shares → per share | $12.29 |
News
bullish +0.60 · 8 articles
- Everpure (P) Dropped From Key Small Cap Indices As Fund Exposure Shifts
- Why Everpure (P) Stock Is Up Today
- 3 Reasons P Has Explosive Upside Potential
- Everpure Stock Gains 34% in 6 Months: Here's What You Should Know
- Bank of America sees 60% upside in Everpure stock
- SCSC or P: Which Is the Better Value Stock Right Now?
- A Look Back at Hardware & Infrastructure Stocks’ Q2 Earnings: Everpure (NYSE:P) Vs The Rest Of The Pack
- Dear Illumina Stock Fans, Mark Your Calendars for September 21
Projected free cash flow to the firm
| Yr | Revenue | Growth | Margin | NOPAT | Reinvest | FCFF | PV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.69B | 10.0% | 6.6% | 258.66M | 144.28M | 114.38M | 102.66M |
| 2 | 5.12B | 9.3% | 6.6% | 282.61M | 147.23M | 135.38M | 109.06M |
| 3 | 5.56B | 8.5% | 6.6% | 306.75M | 148.36M | 158.39M | 114.52M |
| 4 | 5.99B | 7.8% | 6.6% | 330.73M | 147.45M | 183.28M | 118.94M |
| 5 | 6.42B | 7.1% | 6.6% | 354.22M | 144.34M | 209.87M | 122.24M |
| 6 | 6.83B | 6.4% | 6.6% | 376.82M | 138.92M | 237.90M | 124.37M |
| 7 | 7.22B | 5.7% | 6.6% | 398.14M | 131.10M | 267.04M | 125.30M |
| 8 | 7.57B | 4.9% | 6.6% | 417.81M | 120.90M | 296.91M | 125.04M |
| 9 | 7.89B | 4.2% | 6.6% | 435.45M | 108.38M | 327.06M | 123.62M |
| 10 | 8.17B | 3.5% | 6.6% | 450.69M | 93.68M | 357.00M | 121.11M |
⚠ Extreme gap to market price — large, heavily-covered stocks are rarely mispriced this much; the gap likely embeds disruption, decline, or balance-sheet risk the model underweights. Treat as a flag to investigate, not a verdict.